Part 2 from my previous post on your EE-FF post: That city report (a) is at odds with the report that the city put out less than 2 years ago, (b) does not increase revenues with inflation, as both measures allow, (c) does not include the maintenance costs associated with all the new cycle tracks that FF would fund (perhaps because the city is not, in fact, maintaining them well now!), and (d) was issued just before the election in which most of the council supports FF. Need I note therefore that it is obviously biased?
Part 2 from my previous post on your EE-FF post: That city report (a) is at odds with the report that the city put out less than 2 years ago, (b) does not increase revenues with inflation, as both measures allow, (c) does not include the maintenance costs associated with all the new cycle tracks that FF would fund (perhaps because the city is not, in fact, maintaining them well now!), and (d) was issued just before the election in which most of the council supports FF. Need I note therefore that it is obviously biased?